Is Pamela Anderson a Child of God ?

And, WHO the heck is Dan Dhondt ?

The answer to both questions are quite simple...

1. Yes, Pamela is a child of God. All of us are... My personal religious philosophies are best summarized by visiting this link.

2. Dan Dhondt, is simply a "fan" of Pamela - who, as the result of a recent TV interview, has come under scrutiny by members of his own religious persuasion. This "web page" is the result of gossip within my local church affiliation (once again resulting from said interview) and in the hope of addressing this gossip, I submit the following  for your consideration -

Here are a few "observations, questions & food for thought" from Dan's perspective:

• (Q) Why own a Pamela website (avoid the appearance of evil...)

• (A) She is a beautiful women, and I am obviously a fan (lady's - please ask your husbands should you have any questions... Guys - please be honest with yourselves...) of course I also happen to own a couple of websites dedicated to her, www.Pamwatch.com & www.Superpam.com Pamwatch is her official site from when she was with Baywatch and it provides a chronology of news events relating to her. Superpam is simply a good natured (somewhat sophomoric) "spoof" that makes fun of her ever increasing bust size...

• (Q) You are obviously pre-occupied with Pam (why else have these websites...)

• (A) No... As mentioned above, I am a fan... I am also however a business man, and with over 10,000 visitors a day between the two sites, these sites are actually MORE popular than Pam's' own web sites! And, for those that do not understand the Internet, this "traffic" translates into $$$ via advertising... 

• (Q) Isn't Pamela a poor role-model ?

• (A) As I stated during my "E" two hour TV interview (but they chose not to "air"...) I do not agree with many aspects of Pamela's behavior, and/or how she runs her life. She does however have many good attributes, and supports many worthwhile charities. I will not attempt to address this matter in detail here, suffice it to say that she could do much more (couldn't we all?) 

• (Q) Doesn't this site promote pornography?

• (A) No. Please note however that some of the "links" to other Pamela sites may eventually take you to web sites featuring images of Pamela as seen on the cover of magazines and on TV, including images of a pornographic nature. That is the nature of the "World Wide Web".

• (Q) Aren't the pictures on your site of a pornographic nature?

• (A) No. I admit to having some "suggestive" photos of Pam in the past, however there where NO photos that featured full frontal nudity. Many were suggestive photos - not unlike what you would see on the cover of most any magazine. These have however since been removed (please note: my Bishop pointed out that just because everyone else is doing something doesn't mean it is ok...) and I believe the photos that remain are in relative good taste assuming you have a degree of humor - as will be needed at www.Superpam.com and, that you are not entirely a prude as in the case of www.Pamwatch.com -

• (Q) Your site promotes breast augmentation - 

• (A) True, and within the boundaries of our very own Ward there are at least three women that I personally know that have underwent breast augmentation for various reasons. Gee... Do you know anyone that had crooked teeth that are now straight? The answer is multifaceted, but self esteem is certainly a significant aspect.

• (Q) Well... I don't care what you say.... You were on TV promoting Pamela and everything inappropriate that she stands for...

• (A) OK... And you were watching ;-)

Sincerely,

Daniel L Dhondt